340-774-2669 Request a Consultation
VirginLaw > civil rights
The Law Offices of Karin A. Bentz, P.C. has won a major victory with the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in a case involving two former Wico employees, Gerschwain Sprauve and Andrea Smith. Read it at the Virgin Islands Daily News. http://virginislandsdailynews.com/news/court-rules-wico-is-a-government-entity-1.1935931#.VeeFpCjHVuQ.mailto
Under the False Claims Act (FCA) a private person (relator) may bring a qui tam civil action ‘in the name of the Federal Government” against “any person, who, inter alia, “knowing presents. . . to the. . . the . . .Government… a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval.” 31 U.S.C. Section 3729(a). Most states have a False Claims statute. The Virgin Islands Legislature has not enacted a local false claims statute. Residents of the Virgin Islands however may file a qui tam action on behalf of the federal government, if federal funds are implicated.
What is a Qui Tam Action?
Qui tam is a type of lawsuit that a private person may bring against, an individual, a private company, or a municipal corporation (agency of the government) that is defrauding the federal government and recover funds on the behalf of the federal government. The qui tam action is filed under seal, i.e. it is kept secret, to give the U.S. Justice Department an opportunity to investigate the allegation of fraud. If the claims succeed, the relator’s share may be up to 30 percent of the proceeds of the action, plus reasonable expenses, costs, and attorneys’ fees.
Many condo associations, apartment buildings and housing communities in the Virgin Islands have “No Pet” policies for owners and tenants. However, many people with disabilities need emotional support animals to help with daily activities. Dogs are not the only type of animals that can be assistance animals, although they are the most common. Assistance animals do not necessarily have to be certified or specially trained.
Federal law prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of disability. Housing communities are not allowed to refuse or place restrictions on residency due to a disabled person’s need for an assistance animal. Therefore, landlords and housing associations are required to make “reasonable accommodations” to allow disabled persons an equal opportunity to enjoy housing, even in communities with “No Pets” policies in place. A person with a disability can request accommodations for any assistance animal. If a person with a disability can show a link between his or her disability and the need for the animal, they may be entitled to an exception from the “No Pets” policy if the proper request is made to the housing community. This is rightly so, as emotional support assistance animals are not pets – they provide vital emotional support to persons with disabilities. Our Firm has litigated these types of issues so please call for a consultation.
